image

IPC 347

IPC Section 347 – Wrongful Confinement to Extort Property, or Constrain to Illegal Act | Punishment & Free Legal Consultation
Section 347 · Indian Penal Code

IPC Section 347 – Wrongful Confinement to Extort Property, or Constrain to Illegal Act

Section 347 of the Indian Penal Code punishes wrongfully confining a person specifically for the purpose of extorting property or a valuable security from them (or someone interested in them), or of constraining them, or someone interested in them, to do something illegal or give information that could facilitate an offence. It targets confinement used as a coercive tool — including scenarios that resemble modern kidnap-for-ransom or extortion-through-detention.

Punishment: Up to 3 years + fine
Cognizable: Yes
Bailable: Yes
Compoundable: No
BNS 2023 equivalent: Section 127
⚡

Quick Answer: What Does Section 347 Mean?

In simple terms, Section 347 applies when someone wrongfully confines another person — restricting their freedom of movement without lawful justification — specifically to extract property or a valuable security from them or a person connected to them, or to force them (or a connected person) to do something illegal, or to hand over information that would help commit an offence. What separates this from ordinary wrongful confinement (Section 342) is this specific coercive purpose, which elevates the seriousness and the punishment.

Requires wrongful confinement — restricting the person's freedom of movement without legal justification
The confinement must be specifically for one of two purposes: extorting property/valuable security, or constraining an illegal act/harmful information
The extortion or constraint can target the confined person, or anyone else interested in them
Distinct from ordinary confinement (Section 342), which lacks this specific coercive intent

What is IPC Section 347?

IPC Section 347 sits in Chapter XVI of the Indian Penal Code, "Of Offences Affecting the Human Body," within the sub-group "Of Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement" (Sections 339–348). While Section 342 punishes wrongful confinement generally, Sections 343 to 348 address specific aggravating circumstances — confinement for extended periods, confinement in secret, and, in this section, confinement used as leverage for extortion or coercion.

Section 347 is closely related to, but distinct from, kidnapping-for-ransom scenarios, which are typically addressed under the specific abduction and extortion provisions elsewhere in the Code (such as Section 364A). Section 347's core focus is the wrongful confinement itself, done with the specific purpose of extorting property or forcing illegal conduct — connecting the deprivation of liberty directly to the wrongdoer's coercive objective.

Important Update: IPC to BNS Transition

With effect from 1 July 2024, the Indian Penal Code has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 for offences committed on or after that date. Section 347 IPC now corresponds to Section 127 of the BNS, which retains the same substantive scope and punishment, consolidated as a sub-section.

Punishment Under Section 347

PunishmentImprisonment of either description up to 3 years, and fine
Nature of OffenceCognizable — police can register an FIR and investigate/arrest without prior court order
Bailable / Non-BailableBailable — bail is a matter of right
CompoundableNon-compoundable
Triable ByAny Magistrate

This punishment sits meaningfully above the general wrongful confinement offence (up to 1 year under Section 342), reflecting the added seriousness of using confinement as a tool of extortion or coercion — though it remains bailable, distinguishing it from the more serious kidnapping and abduction-for-ransom provisions, which carry substantially harsher, non-bailable consequences.

Key Ingredients / Essential Elements

1

Wrongful confinement

The accused must have wrongfully confined a person, restricting their freedom of movement beyond certain limits, without lawful justification.

2

Purpose of extorting property or a valuable security

The confinement must be aimed at extorting property or a valuable security from the confined person, or from a person interested in them.

3

Alternatively, purpose of constraining an illegal act or harmful information

The offence is equally satisfied where the confinement aims to constrain the confined person, or someone interested in them, to do something illegal, or to give information that would facilitate the commission of an offence.

What Should You Do — For Victims and For the Accused

🛡️

If You or a Loved One Was Confined for Extortion or Coercion

  1. Contact the police immediately if confinement is ongoing, since this is a cognizable offence and rapid police response can be critical.
  2. Document the details of the confinement, including duration, location, and the specific demand made — property, illegal act, or information.
  3. Preserve any communications used to convey the extortion demand, such as calls, messages, or ransom notes.
  4. Consult a lawyer about whether additional, more serious charges — such as kidnapping for ransom or extortion — also apply based on the full facts.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Victim Support
⚖️

If You Are Accused Under Section 347

  1. Consult a criminal lawyer promptly, given the potential overlap with more serious offences depending on the specific facts.
  2. Gather evidence if the confinement was lawful, or if the alleged extortionate or coercive purpose is not actually established.
  3. Being bailable, you are entitled to bail as a matter of right.
  4. Work with your lawyer to assess whether the facts fit within Section 347 specifically, or whether the charges may be more (or less) serious than alleged.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Defence Support

How Section 347 Relates to Neighbouring Provisions

  • Section 342 punishes wrongful confinement generally, without any specific extortionate or coercive purpose.
  • Section 346 punishes wrongful confinement in secret, addressing the added danger of concealing the confinement from those who might intervene.
  • Section 347 (this section) punishes wrongful confinement specifically for extorting property or valuable security, or constraining an illegal act or harmful information.
  • Section 348 punishes the closely related scenario of wrongful confinement specifically to extort a confession or compel restoration of property.
  • Section 364A (kidnapping for ransom) addresses the more serious scenario involving kidnapping or abduction combined with a threat to life, carrying substantially harsher punishment.

Frequently Asked Questions on Section 347

What exactly does IPC Section 347 punish?+
It punishes wrongfully confining a person specifically to extort property or a valuable security, or to constrain the confined person (or someone interested in them) to do something illegal or give harmful information.
Is Section 347 a bailable offence?+
Yes, it is bailable.
What is the difference between Section 342 and Section 347 IPC?+
Section 342 punishes wrongful confinement generally. Section 347 applies where the confinement has the specific purpose of extorting property or constraining an illegal act, carrying a significantly higher punishment.
Does the extortion demand have to target the confined person directly?+
No, the demand can be made against the confined person, or against any other person interested in them — for example, a family member.
Is this the same as kidnapping for ransom?+
Not necessarily — kidnapping for ransom, addressed under Section 364A, involves kidnapping or abduction combined with a threat to life, and carries a much more severe punishment. Section 347 applies to wrongful confinement generally used for extortion or coercion, without necessarily involving those additional elements.
Is Section 347 cognizable?+
Yes, it is cognizable.
Can Section 347 be settled privately?+
No, it is non-compoundable.
Which court tries a case under Section 347?+
Any Magistrate.
Is Section 347 still valid after the BNS came into force?+
IPC Section 347 continues before 1 July 2024; offences after that date fall under Section 127 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
What's the cost of hiring a lawyer for a case involving Section 347?+
Costs vary depending on whether the case involves additional, more serious charges related to kidnapping or extortion. Many lawyers, including our panel, offer a free initial consultation — call +91 94797 98899.
Disclaimer: This page is provided for general legal information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific case, especially given the transition from IPC to BNS.
2,500+Wrongful confinement & extortion cases handled
20+ CitiesAdvocates available pan-India
15+ YearsCombined criminal law experience
24x7Support for urgent legal queries

Get Clarity on a Confinement-for-Extortion Charge

Whether you're pursuing a complaint or defending one under Section 347, speak to an experienced criminal lawyer today.

© 2026 Aapka Legal Advice. This page provides general information about IPC Section 347 and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.
Need urgent legal help?📞 Call +91 94797 98899
WhatsApp
GET IN TOUCH

Get Free Legal Advice from
Aapka Legal Advice Experts

(+91) 94797 98899 FEEL FREE TO CALL US