image

IPC 13

IPC Section 13 – Definition of "Queen" (Omitted) | Legal Meaning & Free Legal Consultation
Section 13 · Indian Penal Code (Omitted)

IPC Section 13 – Definition of "Queen" (Omitted)

Section 13 of the original Indian Penal Code, 1860 defined the word "Queen" as referring to the reigning British monarch, whose authority the Code originally operated under during the colonial era. This provision was formally omitted by the Adaptation of Orders, 1950, following India's transition to a sovereign, democratic republic under its own Constitution, and has remained a blank, non-operative section in the Code ever since — a historical artifact reflecting the IPC's colonial origins.

Nature: Omitted Definitional Section
Chapter: II – General Explanations
Status: Omitted by the Adaptation of Orders, 1950
BNS 2023 Status: No Corresponding Section
⚡

Quick Answer: What Was Section 13?

In simple terms, Section 13 of the original 1860 Indian Penal Code provided a definition of the word "Queen" — a term that, unsurprisingly given the Code's colonial-era origins, appeared throughout the original text to refer to sovereign authority, government property, and offences against the state, all understood in relation to the British Crown. Once India adopted its Constitution and became a sovereign republic in 1950, retaining a definition tied to a foreign monarch made no legal or practical sense, and the section was formally omitted through the Adaptation of Orders, 1950 — an instrument specifically used to update pre-independence legislation to reflect India's new constitutional status. Since then, Section 13 has remained an empty, non-operative placeholder in the Code, alongside several other similarly omitted provisions (Sections 15 and 16, defining "British India" and "Government of India" respectively).

Originally defined "Queen" as referring to the reigning British monarch
Omitted by the Adaptation of Orders, 1950, following India's transition to a republic
Has remained a blank, non-operative section since 1950
No corresponding provision exists in the BNS, 2023

What Was IPC Section 13?

IPC Section 13, as originally enacted in 1860, fell within Chapter II of the Indian Penal Code ("General Explanations"), the chapter dedicated to defining key terms used repeatedly throughout the Code's substantive provisions. As a piece of colonial-era legislation drafted under British administration in India, the original 1860 Code naturally contained numerous references to the British Crown, government, and sovereign authority — Section 13's definition of "Queen" was one such reference, providing the interpretive foundation for how the term was to be understood wherever it appeared in the Code's offence-defining sections.

Today, Section 13 exists only as a historical footnote — the section number remains reserved in the Code's structure, but its substantive content has been entirely removed, with only a marginal note indicating "[Definition of 'Queen'.] Omitted by the A.O. 1950" appearing in modern printed versions of the Indian Penal Code.

Important Update: IPC to BNS Transition

With effect from 1 July 2024, the Indian Penal Code has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 for offences committed on or after that date. Given that Section 13 had already been rendered blank and non-operative since 1950, the BNS does not include any corresponding provision at all — this is a clean, complete removal, consistent with the section's decades-long dormant status under the IPC.

Historical Context: The IPC's Colonial Origins

The Indian Penal Code was drafted based on the recommendations of the First Law Commission of India, chaired by Thomas Babington Macaulay, established in 1834 under the Charter Act of 1833. The draft was submitted in 1837 and, after extensive revisions, finally enacted in 1860, coming into force on 1 January 1862. As a product of British colonial administration, the original Code naturally incorporated numerous references to British sovereign authority, reflecting the political and constitutional reality of India at the time — a British colony governed under the authority of the Crown.

Section 13's definition of "Queen" was a direct product of this colonial context, providing legal clarity on a term that appeared throughout the Code in provisions addressing offences against the state, government property, and public administration, all of which were originally framed by reference to the British monarch as the ultimate source of governmental authority in colonial India.

The Omission in 1950: India's Transition to a Republic

India achieved independence from British rule in 1947, but retained the British monarch as a formal head of state (via the Governor-General) for a brief transitional period, becoming a fully sovereign, democratic republic only on 26 January 1950, when the Constitution of India came into force. This constitutional transformation necessitated a comprehensive review and adaptation of pre-independence legislation, including the Indian Penal Code, to strip out or update provisions that referenced now-obsolete colonial institutions, offices, and authorities.

The Adaptation of Orders, 1950 (and related adaptation instruments) served precisely this function — systematically updating and, where necessary, omitting provisions across various pre-independence statutes to align them with India's new constitutional status as a sovereign republic. Section 13's definition of "Queen," having no continuing relevance once India ceased to recognize the British monarch's authority, was accordingly omitted as part of this broader legislative housekeeping exercise.

Status Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Since Section 13 had already been rendered entirely blank and non-operative for over seven decades by the time the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was drafted, official comparative tables and commentary confirm that the BNS contains no corresponding provision whatsoever for this section — unlike most IPC sections, which were carried forward into the BNS with renumbering (and, in some cases, substantive modification), Section 13's already-omitted status meant there was simply nothing left to carry forward or renumber.

Important Notes on Section 13

Historical Legislative Record

The Adaptation of Orders as a Legislative Tool

The various Adaptation of Laws Orders issued around India's independence and transition to a republic (including the Adaptation Order, 1937, the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950, and the Adaptation of Laws (No. 3) Order, 1956) served as the specific legislative mechanisms through which pre-independence statutes, including the IPC, were systematically updated, with obsolete colonial-era terms and references either omitted or replaced with terms appropriate to India's new constitutional status.

Principle relied on: Legislative continuity across major constitutional transitions (such as independence and the adoption of a republican constitution) is typically managed through targeted adaptation orders, rather than wholesale re-enactment of existing statutes, allowing pre-existing laws to remain generally in force while removing or updating provisions rendered obsolete by the change in governance.
General Observation

Omitted Sections as Historical Markers

Legal commentators and historians of Indian law have noted that the presence of omitted sections like Section 13 within the structure of the IPC (and now, their complete absence from the BNS) serves as a useful marker of India's legal and constitutional evolution, illustrating how colonial-era legislation was adapted, rather than entirely discarded, to fit India's post-independence governance framework.

Principle relied on: The IPC's structure, including its omitted sections, reflects a broader pattern in Indian legal history of adaptive continuity — retaining the overall framework of colonial-era codes while removing or updating specific provisions tied to superseded political and constitutional arrangements.

Frequently Asked Questions on Section 13

What did IPC Section 13 originally define?+
It originally defined the word "Queen" as referring to the reigning British monarch, under whose authority the original 1860 Code was enacted.
Is Section 13 still part of the IPC today?+
The section number remains reserved in the Code's structure, but its substantive content was omitted in 1950 and has never been replaced — it is now a blank, non-operative provision.
Why was this section omitted?+
Because India became a sovereign, democratic republic under its own Constitution in 1950, making a definition tied to the British monarch's authority obsolete.
What legislative instrument omitted this section?+
The Adaptation of Orders, 1950, one of several adaptation instruments used to update pre-independence Indian legislation following constitutional changes.
Are there other similarly omitted sections in the IPC?+
Yes, Sections 15 (definition of "British India") and 16 (definition of "Government of India") were also omitted through earlier adaptation orders, for similar reasons.
Does the BNS, 2023 have a corresponding provision for Section 13?+
No, since Section 13 was already blank and non-operative for decades before the BNS was drafted, no corresponding provision exists in the new Code.
Is this section relevant to any modern criminal case?+
No, given its complete omission and lack of substantive content, it has no bearing on any contemporary criminal matter.
What does this section tell us about the IPC's history?+
It serves as a historical marker of the IPC's colonial origins and India's subsequent constitutional transformation into a sovereign, democratic republic.
Did the British monarch's authority feature in other parts of the original Code?+
Yes, various provisions of the original 1860 Code referenced the Crown's authority, most of which were similarly adapted, updated, or replaced following India's independence and adoption of the Constitution.
Is Section 13 IPC still valid after the BNS came into force?+
Section 13 had already been rendered non-operative decades before the BNS came into force on 1 July 2024, and the BNS carries forward no equivalent provision whatsoever.
Disclaimer: This page is provided for general legal and historical information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Please verify current provisions with a qualified advocate before taking any action.
2,500+Legal history & interpretation cases handled
20+ CitiesAdvocates available pan-India
15+ YearsCombined criminal law experience
24x7Support for urgent legal queries

Need Help Understanding the IPC-to-BNS Transition?

Speak to an experienced criminal lawyer today for a free, confidential evaluation.

© 2026 Aapka Legal Advice. This page provides general information about IPC Section 13 and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.
Need urgent legal help?📞 Call +91 94797 98899
WhatsApp
GET IN TOUCH

Get Free Legal Advice from
Aapka Legal Advice Experts

(+91) 94797 98899 FEEL FREE TO CALL US