image

IPC 276

IPC Section 276 – Sale of Drug as a Different Drug or Preparation | Punishment & Free Legal Consultation
Section 276 · Indian Penal Code

IPC Section 276 – Sale of Drug as a Different Drug or Preparation

Section 276 of the Indian Penal Code punishes knowingly selling, offering or exposing for sale, or issuing from a dispensary for medicinal purposes, a drug or medical preparation as though it were a different drug or medical preparation. Unlike Section 274 (which addresses adulteration), this offence covers outright substitution — passing off one substance for another, regardless of whether either drug is itself adulterated, wherever a patient may end up receiving entirely the wrong medicine.

Punishment: Up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹1,000, or both
Cognizable: No
Bailable: Yes
Compoundable: No
BNS 2023 equivalent: Section 278
⚡

Quick Answer: What Does Section 276 Mean?

In simple terms, Section 276 applies when someone knowingly sells, offers for sale, or dispenses one drug or medical preparation while representing it as a completely different one — for example, handing out a different medication than what was actually prescribed or requested, knowing full well the substitution is happening. This is distinct from adulteration (Section 274), since the drug being sold might itself be perfectly genuine and unadulterated — the wrong is specifically in the deception about which drug it actually is, a mistake that can have serious, even dangerous, health consequences if the patient receives a medicine with entirely different effects than intended.

Requires knowing sale, offer, exposure for sale, or dispensary issuance as a different drug
Distinct from adulteration — the drug itself may be genuine, but misrepresented as something else
Applies specifically where the substitution is for a medicinal purpose
Some states, including Uttar Pradesh, have dramatically increased this offence's punishment by amendment

What is IPC Section 276?

IPC Section 276 sits in Chapter XIV of the Indian Penal Code, "Of Offences Affecting the Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency and Morals," at the end of the cluster addressing drug-related public health offences (Sections 274–276). Where Section 274 punishes adulterating a drug, and Section 275 punishes knowingly selling an adulterated drug as unadulterated, Section 276 addresses a related but conceptually distinct wrong — misrepresenting one genuine, unadulterated drug as though it were an entirely different one.

This distinction matters in practice: a pharmacist who knowingly dispenses paracetamol while claiming it is a different, prescribed medication commits this specific offence, even though the paracetamol itself may be perfectly genuine and unadulterated — the harm lies in the patient unknowingly receiving the wrong treatment, with potentially serious consequences depending on what condition they were actually being treated for.

Important Update: IPC to BNS Transition

With effect from 1 July 2024, the Indian Penal Code has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 for offences committed on or after that date. Section 276 IPC now corresponds to Section 278 of the BNS, which raises the maximum fine from ₹1,000 to ₹5,000, retaining the same substantive scope otherwise.

Punishment Under Section 276

Punishment (Central/General)Imprisonment of either description up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹1,000, or both
Nature of OffenceNon-cognizable — police generally require a Magistrate's order to investigate or arrest
Bailable / Non-BailableBailable — bail is a matter of right
CompoundableNon-compoundable
Triable ByAny Magistrate
Uttar Pradesh State AmendmentImprisonment for life, with or without fine — Cognizable, Non-bailable, Court of Session

The striking gap between the central punishment scheme and Uttar Pradesh's state amendment — from a modest, bailable 6-month maximum to potential life imprisonment — illustrates how significantly criminal law consequences for the same conduct can diverge across Indian states, given states' constitutional power to amend Central Acts within their own territory.

Key Ingredients / Essential Elements

1

Knowledge of the substitution

The accused must have known that the drug or medical preparation was actually different from what was being represented.

2

Selling, offering, exposing for sale, or dispensary issuance

The accused must have sold, offered or exposed for sale, or issued the drug from a dispensary for medicinal purposes.

3

Representation as a different drug

The drug or preparation must have been represented as a different drug or medical preparation than what it actually was.

What Should You Do — For Victims and For the Accused

🛡️

If You Were Given the Wrong Medicine

  1. Seek medical attention immediately if you suspect you received the wrong drug, particularly if you have experienced any adverse effects.
  2. Preserve the medication packaging, receipt, and any prescription documentation as evidence.
  3. File a complaint before the appropriate Magistrate, since the offence is non-cognizable.
  4. Consult a lawyer about pursuing both criminal proceedings and any available civil claims for resulting harm, and consider reporting the matter to relevant drug regulatory authorities.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Victim Support
⚖️

If You Are Accused Under Section 276

  1. Consult a criminal lawyer promptly to assess the specific facts, including whether you genuinely knew the substitution was occurring.
  2. Gather evidence if the substitution was genuinely accidental — for example, a clerical or inventory error, made without the required knowledge.
  3. Being bailable under the central provision, you are entitled to bail as a matter of right, though check whether a state amendment applies to your location.
  4. Work with your lawyer to understand how the specific facts of your case are treated under the applicable central or state provision.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Defence Support

How Section 276 Relates to Neighbouring Provisions

  • Section 274 punishes adulterating a drug or medical preparation.
  • Section 275 punishes knowingly selling an adulterated drug as unadulterated.
  • Section 276 (this section) punishes knowingly selling, offering, or dispensing one drug as a different drug altogether.
  • The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 operates as a specialised, more detailed statutory framework governing drug quality, labelling, and misbranding, often providing more stringent and specific penalties, and frequently forms the primary basis for prosecution in serious pharmaceutical misrepresentation cases.

Frequently Asked Questions on Section 276

What exactly does IPC Section 276 punish?+
It punishes knowingly selling, offering or exposing for sale, or issuing from a dispensary for medicinal purposes, a drug or medical preparation as a different drug or medical preparation.
Is Section 276 a bailable offence?+
Yes, under the central provision it is bailable — though check for applicable state amendments, such as in Uttar Pradesh, which classify it as non-bailable.
What is the difference between Section 274 and Section 276 IPC?+
Section 274 addresses adulteration — tampering with a drug's composition or quality. Section 276 addresses substitution — knowingly selling or dispensing one genuine drug while representing it as an entirely different one.
Does an honest dispensing error attract this section?+
No, the section requires knowledge that the drug being sold or dispensed was actually different — a genuine, unintentional error does not satisfy this requirement.
Why does Uttar Pradesh have such a different punishment for this offence?+
Uttar Pradesh enacted a specific state amendment substituting the punishment for Sections 272–276 with imprisonment for life, reflecting that state's own heightened policy response to public health concerns around adulterated and substituted food and drugs.
Is Section 276 cognizable?+
No, under the central provision, it is non-cognizable (though state amendments in some states may classify it differently).
Can Section 276 be settled privately?+
No, it is non-compoundable.
Which court tries a case under Section 276?+
Under the central provision, any Magistrate; in Uttar Pradesh, the Court of Session under the state amendment.
Is Section 276 still valid after the BNS came into force?+
IPC Section 276 continues before 1 July 2024; offences after that date fall under Section 278 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which raises the maximum fine to ₹5,000.
What's the cost of hiring a lawyer for a case involving Section 276?+
Costs vary significantly depending on whether the central provision or a state amendment applies, and any related Drugs and Cosmetics Act proceedings. Many lawyers, including our panel, offer a free initial consultation — call +91 94797 98899.
Disclaimer: This page is provided for general legal information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific case, especially given the transition from IPC to BNS and applicable state amendments.
2,500+Drug safety & public health cases handled
20+ CitiesAdvocates available pan-India
15+ YearsCombined criminal law experience
24x7Support for urgent legal queries

Get Clarity on a Drug Substitution Charge

Whether you're pursuing a complaint or defending one under Section 276, speak to an experienced criminal lawyer today.

© 2026 Aapka Legal Advice. This page provides general information about IPC Section 276 and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.
Need urgent legal help?📞 Call +91 94797 98899
WhatsApp
GET IN TOUCH

Get Free Legal Advice from
Aapka Legal Advice Experts

(+91) 94797 98899 FEEL FREE TO CALL US