image

IPC 368

IPC Section 368 – Wrongfully Concealing or Keeping in Confinement a Kidnapped/Abducted Person | Bail, FIR & Free Legal Consultation
Section 368 · Indian Penal Code

IPC Section 368 – Wrongfully Concealing or Keeping in Confinement a Kidnapped/Abducted Person

Section 368 of the Indian Penal Code punishes a person who, knowing that another person has been kidnapped or abducted, wrongfully conceals or confines that person. This section extends criminal liability beyond the original kidnapper or abductor to anyone who knowingly participates afterward by hiding or detaining the victim, and it is punished exactly as severely as the underlying kidnapping or abduction offence itself.

Punishment: Same as for the Underlying Kidnapping/Abduction Offence
Cognizable: Yes
Bailable: Depends on Underlying Offence (Generally Non-Bailable)
Compoundable: No
BNS 2023 equivalent: Section 141
⚡

Quick Answer: What Does Section 368 Mean?

In simple terms, Section 368 applies to a person who knows that someone else has been kidnapped or abducted, and who then wrongfully conceals or confines that victim — for example, hiding the kidnapped person in a location to prevent discovery or rescue, even if that person did not participate in the original kidnapping or abduction. The law treats this as equally serious as the underlying offence, prescribing the exact same punishment that would apply to the kidnapping or abduction itself, based on the intention or purpose with or for which the victim is being concealed or confined.

Applies to knowingly concealing or confining a kidnapped/abducted person
Can apply even to persons who did not commit the original kidnapping/abduction
Punishable in the same manner as the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence
Cognizable; bailability and trial court depend on the nature of the underlying offence

What is IPC Section 368?

IPC Section 368 falls within Chapter XVI of the Indian Penal Code ("Of Offences Affecting the Human Body"), within the sub-group of sections dealing with kidnapping, abduction, slavery, and forced labour (Sections 359 to 374). Kidnapping (from India or from lawful guardianship) is defined under Sections 359-361, while abduction is defined under Section 362; various sections thereafter prescribe punishment for these offences depending on the purpose for which they are committed (Sections 363-369).

Section 368 addresses a distinct but related act: rather than the initial taking away of the victim, it punishes the subsequent wrongful concealment or confinement of a person already known by the accused to have been kidnapped or abducted. This provision is significant because it extends liability to persons who may not have participated in the original abduction but who knowingly assist in keeping the victim hidden or restrained afterward — such as a person who shelters a kidnapped child, or confines an abducted person in a room to prevent their escape or rescue. The section specifies that such a person "shall be punished in the same manner as if he had kidnapped or abducted such person with the same intention or knowledge, or for the same purpose" as that with or for which the concealment or confinement is carried out — meaning the punishment mirrors that applicable to the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence based on its specific purpose (e.g., for ransom, for murder, for unlawful compulsion, etc.).

Important Update: IPC to BNS Transition

With effect from 1 July 2024, the Indian Penal Code has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 for offences committed on or after that date. Section 368 IPC now corresponds to Section 141 of the BNS, which retains the identical structure of mirroring the punishment of the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence. FIRs registered before 1 July 2024 continue to be tried under IPC 368; incidents after that date are registered under the corresponding BNS provision.

Punishment Under Section 368

Imprisonment/FineMirrors the punishment applicable to the underlying kidnapping or abduction offence, based on the intention/purpose for which the person is concealed or confined (e.g., Section 363 for simple kidnapping — up to 7 years + fine; higher for purpose-specific offences like kidnapping for ransom or murder)
Nature of OffenceCognizable — police can register an FIR and investigate without a warrant
Bailable / Non-BailableDepends on the underlying offence's classification — generally non-bailable where the underlying offence carries a serious purpose (e.g., ransom, murder)
CompoundableNot compoundable — the case cannot be withdrawn or settled directly between the parties
Triable ByDepends on the underlying offence — Magistrate of the First Class for simple kidnapping cases, Court of Session for more serious purpose-based offences
Related ProvisionsSection 359-362 (definitions of kidnapping/abduction), Section 363 (punishment for kidnapping), Section 364A (kidnapping for ransom), Section 365 (kidnapping to secretly confine)

Key Ingredients / Essential Elements

1

The victim must have been kidnapped or abducted

There must be an underlying act of kidnapping (as defined in Sections 359-361) or abduction (Section 362) of the victim by someone.

2

The accused must have knowledge of the kidnapping/abduction

The accused must know that the person they are concealing or confining has, in fact, been kidnapped or abducted.

3

Wrongful concealment or confinement of the victim

The accused must have wrongfully hidden the victim from discovery, or confined/restrained their movement, preventing rescue or escape.

4

The punishment is tied to the intention/purpose behind the concealment

The specific punishment applicable mirrors the corresponding kidnapping/abduction offence based on the purpose for which the concealment or confinement is carried out.

What Should You Do — For Complainants and For the Accused

🛡️

If a Family Member Has Been Kidnapped and Is Being Concealed

  1. File an FIR immediately at the nearest police station — being cognizable, the police must register the complaint and begin investigation into both the kidnapping and any suspected concealment.
  2. Provide any information about persons who may be knowingly assisting in hiding or confining the victim, even if they were not involved in the original abduction.
  3. Cooperate closely with investigators, since Section 368 often becomes relevant in ongoing search-and-rescue operations where the victim's location is unknown.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Victim Family Support
⚖️

If You Are Accused Under Section 368

  1. Given the offence mirrors the underlying kidnapping/abduction punishment, bail eligibility depends on that specific offence — engage a lawyer promptly to assess this and file the appropriate bail application.
  2. A key defence is to show that you did not have actual knowledge that the person you were with had been kidnapped or abducted, since this knowledge is an essential ingredient.
  3. Another possible defence is to demonstrate that there was no wrongful concealment or confinement — for example, if the person was free to leave or was not being restrained.
📞 Talk to a Lawyer — Defence Support

FIR & Bail Process Under Section 368

STEP 1

Filing the FIR

Being cognizable, the police are obligated to register an FIR upon receiving information about the kidnapping/abduction and any suspected subsequent concealment.

STEP 2

Investigation

Police investigate to locate the victim, identify persons involved in concealment or confinement, and establish their knowledge of the kidnapping/abduction.

STEP 3

Bail

Bail eligibility depends on the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence's classification — the accused must apply accordingly before the relevant Magistrate or Sessions Court.

STEP 4

Trial

The case is tried before the court appropriate to the underlying offence, and being non-compoundable, must proceed through the full trial process.

Important / Landmark Cases on Section 368

General Judicial Interpretation

Extension of Liability Beyond the Original Kidnapper

Courts have applied Section 368 to hold liable persons who, while not participating in the initial act of kidnapping or abduction, knowingly assisted afterward by hiding the victim or preventing their rescue, recognizing that such conduct perpetuates the harm caused by the original offence.

Principle relied on: Section 368 is designed to prevent persons from escaping liability merely because they did not participate in the initial kidnapping or abduction, so long as they knowingly and wrongfully concealed or confined the victim afterward.
General Judicial Interpretation

Requirement of Actual Knowledge

Courts have emphasized that mere suspicion or constructive knowledge is insufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 368 — the prosecution must establish that the accused had actual knowledge that the person being concealed or confined had, in fact, been kidnapped or abducted.

Principle relied on: The word "knowing" in Section 368 requires proof of the accused's actual awareness of the kidnapping/abduction, distinguishing genuine complicity from innocent association with the victim.

Frequently Asked Questions on Section 368

What exactly does IPC Section 368 punish?+
It punishes knowingly and wrongfully concealing or confining a person who has been kidnapped or abducted, with the same punishment as the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence.
Is Section 368 a bailable offence?+
This depends on the classification of the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence — generally non-bailable where the purpose is serious, such as ransom or murder.
Can Section 368 cases be settled directly?+
No, it is a non-compoundable offence and cannot be withdrawn privately between the parties.
Can someone be charged under Section 368 even if they didn't kidnap the person themselves?+
Yes, this section specifically targets persons who knowingly conceal or confine a victim after the kidnapping/abduction, regardless of whether they participated in the original act.
Does the accused need to know the victim was kidnapped?+
Yes, actual knowledge that the person had been kidnapped or abducted is an essential ingredient of this offence.
How is the punishment determined under Section 368?+
The punishment mirrors that applicable to the underlying kidnapping/abduction offence, based on the specific intention or purpose behind the concealment or confinement.
Which court tries a Section 368 case?+
This depends on the underlying offence — a Magistrate of the First Class for simple kidnapping, or the Court of Session for more serious purpose-based kidnapping/abduction offences.
Is Section 368 often charged with other offences?+
Yes, commonly alongside the underlying kidnapping/abduction sections (359-367), and sometimes Section 342 (wrongful confinement) or Section 365 (kidnapping to secretly confine).
What should I do if I'm falsely accused under Section 368?+
Consult a criminal lawyer immediately to assess bail eligibility and to challenge whether actual knowledge of the kidnapping/abduction, and wrongful concealment, are genuinely established.
Is Section 368 IPC still valid after the BNS came into force?+
IPC Section 368 continues for offences before 1 July 2024; after that, Section 141 BNS applies with the same structure.
Disclaimer: This page is provided for general legal information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Please verify current provisions with a qualified advocate before taking any action.
2,500+Kidnapping & abduction-related cases handled
20+ CitiesAdvocates available pan-India
15+ YearsCombined criminal law experience
24x7Support for urgent legal queries

Get Help With a Section 368 Case Quickly

Speak to an experienced criminal lawyer today for a free, confidential evaluation.

© 2026 Aapka Legal Advice. This page provides general information about IPC Section 368 and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.
Need urgent legal help?📞 Call +91 94797 98899
WhatsApp
GET IN TOUCH

Get Free Legal Advice from
Aapka Legal Advice Experts

(+91) 94797 98899 FEEL FREE TO CALL US