Yes, Delhi courts do consider CCTV footage at both the bail and trial stages, and it can be a genuinely powerful piece of defense material if it directly contradicts the version set out in the FIR. At the bail stage, courts often look at such footage while assessing whether the allegations are prima facie credible, whether custodial interrogation is truly necessary, or whether the case appears to be a case of false implication — strong contradictory footage can meaningfully support an anticipatory or regular bail application. At trial, the footage becomes substantive evidence, but it needs to be properly proved and admitted, which requires the original recording (or an authenticated copy) along with a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act (now Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam) confirming how it was obtained and that it hasn't been tampered with. Without this certificate, courts can and often do refuse to rely on electronic evidence, no matter how compelling it looks. Practically, the biggest risk here is time — CCTV systems typically overwrite footage within days to a few weeks, so you should not wait for a hearing date to act. File an application before the investigating officer or the court immediately to have the footage preserved and obtain certified copies, and keep a clear record of the device, location, and date range the footage covers, since this chain-of-custody detail is exactly what the defense will need to establish later.

For the best possible outcome, it is recommended to consult experienced retired judges and seek guidance from Aapka Legal Advice, whose panel can advise you on preserving this footage correctly and using it effectively at both the bail and trial stage.