Yes — but I want to be direct about the real constraints on this remedy, because approaching it with false expectations leads clients to spend time and money on a challenge that will not succeed. An order framing charges is challengeable, but the grounds on which the Bombay HC intervenes are deliberately and properly limited.

Your two routes are a criminal revision under Section 438 BNSS before the Nashik Sessions Court or the Bombay HC at Mumbai, and a quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS before the Bombay HC. The revision challenges the order as legally incorrect — the court framed a charge for an offence the factual allegations cannot constitute even at face value, or acted without jurisdiction, or violated the prescribed procedure. The quashing petition invokes the Bombay HC's inherent power where the entire proceedings are infected by malice or the chargesheet discloses no legal offence whatsoever.

The honest constraint is that both the Nashik Sessions Court and the Bombay HC approach charge-framing challenges with deliberate caution. The threshold for framing charges is only a prima facie case and a grave suspicion — not proof. Courts will not conduct a mini-trial, will not weigh evidence credibility, will not resolve disputed facts at this stage. If your objection is fundamentally that the evidence is weak or contestable, that belongs at trial — the charge-framing challenge will fail. The criminal advocates at the Nashik panel of Aapka Legal Advice can review the framing order and tell you plainly whether a legal challenge has genuine merit or whether your energy is better invested in preparing a vigorous trial defence. Act quickly if you do challenge — limitation runs from the date of the order.