If you are a husband facing multiple cases, including a Section 498A complaint, a maintenance claim, and a Domestic Violence Act application, all filed by your wife, understanding your genuinely available counter-case and defence options is important.

The first and most important step is engaging an experienced advocate to properly and comprehensively coordinate your defence across all three of these connected proceedings, since, given they arise from the same underlying matrimonial dispute, a unified overall strategy generally serves your interests better than addressing each in complete isolation.

Regarding the Section 498A complaint, now falling under Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), it is worth pursuing the specific defence strategies discussed extensively throughout this broader context, including highlighting any lack of specificity in the allegations, pursuing anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), and, where genuinely warranted, pursuing quashing before the High Court under Section 528 of the BNSS.

Regarding the maintenance claim, it is worth ensuring your advocate properly presents your genuine financial circumstances through the comprehensive disclosure framework established in Rajnesh v. Neha, ensuring any maintenance amount ultimately determined properly reflects your actual capacity rather than an inflated demand.

Regarding the Domestic Violence Act application, it is worth understanding, as discussed extensively throughout this broader context regarding the Supreme Court's 2025 decision in Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal, that you retain the right to pursue quashing of this proceeding before the High Court where the allegations genuinely lack merit or particularity.

If you genuinely believe these multiple filings reflect retaliatory or strategic motivation rather than genuine, independent grievances, it is worth having your advocate properly document this pattern, including the specific timing of these various filings relative to any specific events or disputes between you and your wife, since this kind of documented pattern can become relevant context across all three connected proceedings.

If you believe you have your own genuine grievances against your wife, it is worth discussing with your advocate whether pursuing your own divorce petition, based on whatever specific ground genuinely applies to your circumstances, represents an appropriate counter-strategy, since this allows you to proactively present your own position rather than remaining purely defensive across these various proceedings.

If you have genuine evidence that specific allegations made against you in any of these proceedings are demonstrably false, it is worth discussing with your advocate whether pursuing a defamation complaint under Section 356 of the BNS might eventually be appropriate, though, as discussed extensively throughout this broader context, this is generally best pursued once the underlying proceedings have concluded in your favour, rather than while they remain genuinely pending and unresolved.

If a genuine settlement addressing all three connected matters together might be achievable, it is worth exploring this comprehensive resolution possibility, since properly and comprehensively resolving your entire dispute through a single, coordinated settlement can bring all three proceedings to a proper and complete close, following the principles discussed extensively throughout this broader context regarding resolving multiple connected matrimonial matters together.

Given how genuinely complex it is to properly navigate three simultaneously pending proceedings arising from the same underlying dispute, it is essential to consult an experienced family law advocate who can properly coordinate a comprehensive overall strategy. You can reach out via Aapka Legal Advice for guidance on properly and comprehensively addressing all three of these connected proceedings.

You can review Top Divorce Lawyers in India | Aapka Legal Advice for relevant experience handling these combined matrimonial matters.

Many people find real value in obtaining an independent, experienced perspective from the panel of retired judges available through certain legal consultation platforms.

If formal legal representation is required, engaging an experienced advocate will ensure this comprehensive combination of proceedings is properly and effectively coordinated.

In summary, a husband facing multiple cases including 498A, maintenance, and DV filed by his wife should engage an advocate to properly coordinate a unified defence strategy across all three connected proceedings, pursuing quashing where genuinely warranted for the criminal and DV matters, properly presenting his genuine financial circumstances to counter the maintenance claim, considering whether pursuing his own divorce petition represents an appropriate proactive counter-strategy, and exploring whether a comprehensive settlement addressing all three matters together might bring this entire dispute to a proper resolution.