The Enforcement Directorate has attached my residential property and business assets claiming they are proceeds of crime. I have not yet been convicted of any offence. Can I apply for release of attached property during the pendency of trial and what grounds must I establish before the court in Kolkata?
If the Enforcement Directorate has attached your property in connection with a money laundering investigation in Kolkata, you're likely wondering whether you need to wait until the trial concludes to get it back, and the answer is that release during trial is possible, though it requires navigating a fairly specific procedural path. Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, once property is provisionally attached, the matter must be placed before the Adjudicating Authority within a stipulated period, which then examines whether the attachment should be confirmed. Even after confirmation, the accused retains avenues to seek release, particularly where the property is not proceeds of crime or where retaining the attachment causes disproportionate hardship.
One important route is approaching the Special Court or the Appellate Tribunal under PMLA, arguing that the attached property has no connection to the alleged proceeds of crime, or that its value far exceeds what could reasonably be attributable to the offence, in which case courts have in appropriate cases directed release or de-attachment of the excess. Additionally, where the property in question is essential for basic living needs, such as the only residential house of the accused's family, courts have shown willingness to consider release on humanitarian grounds, balancing the ED's interest in preserving proceeds of crime against genuine hardship.
It is also worth understanding that an appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's confirmation order can be filed before the Appellate Tribunal, and further before the High Court on questions of law, giving you multiple stages at which to contest an attachment you believe is unjustified. Each stage requires demonstrating with documentary evidence exactly how the property was acquired and why it should not be treated as tainted.
Because PMLA proceedings involve a specialised and fairly technical procedural framework quite different from ordinary criminal trials, it's important to have your case handled by someone familiar specifically with money laundering litigation. Aapka Legal Advice can help assess whether your attached property has genuine grounds for release during the pendency of trial.
If your property has been attached by the ED in Kolkata and the trial is ongoing, don't assume release is impossible until the case concludes. Speak with experienced criminal lawyers in Kolkata about your options for seeking release now.
