Yes — but I want to be direct about the genuine constraints on this remedy, because approaching it with false confidence leads clients to spend significant time and money on a challenge that will not succeed. An order framing charges by a Vadodara court is challengeable, but the grounds on which higher courts interfere are deliberately and properly limited.

Your two routes are a criminal revision under Section 438 BNSS before the Vadodara Sessions Court or the Gujarat HC at Ahmedabad, and a quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS before the Gujarat HC. The revision challenges the order as legally incorrect — the court has framed a charge for an offence the factual allegations cannot constitute, or has acted without jurisdiction, or has violated a prescribed procedure in framing charges. The quashing petition invokes the Gujarat HC's inherent power where the entire proceedings are infected by malice or where the chargesheet discloses no legal offence whatsoever.

The honest constraint is that the Gujarat HC, like all High Courts, approaches charge-framing challenges with deliberate caution. The threshold for framing charges is only a prima facie case and a grave suspicion — not proof, not a finding of guilt. A court that frames charges is not convicting you; it is saying only that the matter is fit for trial. Higher courts will not conduct a mini-trial at this stage, will not weigh evidence credibility, will not resolve factual disputes, and will decline to interfere unless there is a demonstrable legal error on the face of the record. If your objection is fundamentally that the evidence is weak or contestable, that belongs at trial rather than in a revision petition. The criminal defence advocates at the Vadodara panel of Aapka Legal Advice can review the framing order and tell you plainly whether a challenge has genuine legal merit or whether your energy is better invested in preparing a vigorous trial defence.

Act quickly if you do intend to challenge: limitation runs from the date of the order, and delay weakens both the legal and the practical case for intervention.