Notifications
Clear all

My lawyer says I should file a revision petition in Vadodara. What is it?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
58 Views
Posts: 1
Topic starter
(@Ekam Nijjar)
Joined: 3 months ago
[#1690]
A Magistrate Court in Vadodara passed an order against me. My advocate recommends filing a revision petition. How does a revision differ from an appeal?

1 Reply
Posts: 4390
(@advocate-mudit-pratap)
Member
Joined: 4 months ago

Let me explain this remedy clearly, because "revision" is a term many clients have encountered without precisely understanding what it does and — crucially — how it differs from an appeal. A criminal revision petition is a request to a higher court to examine whether a specific order passed by a lower court was legally correct, within its jurisdiction, and procedurally proper. It is provided under Section 438 of the BNSS (the old Section 397 CrPC), with the Gujarat High Court's revisional powers set out in Section 442 BNSS (formerly Section 401 CrPC).

The essential distinction from an appeal: an appeal is a broad re-hearing in which the appellate court re-examines the full evidence and can substitute its own conclusion on fact and law. A revision is narrower and discretionary — the revisional court examines the order for patent illegality, a jurisdictional defect, or a manifestly improper decision, rather than re-arguing the whole case. It cannot re-examine witnesses, cannot reconsider evidence as an appellate court would, and will not interfere simply because the applicant is unhappy with the result. The revisional court can call for the lower court's record, hear the parties, and set aside, modify, or confirm the impugned order — but only where a specific, identifiable legal error exists.

In Vadodara's criminal practice, revision is most commonly used where an appeal does not lie as of right — against certain interlocutory orders, against an order framing charges, or against specific Magistrate orders that do not directly attract a statutory appeal. Key procedural features: limitation is generally ninety days from the impugned order; there is a bar on a second revision — a revision refused by the Vadodara Sessions Court cannot be followed by another revision to the Gujarat HC on the same order (you would instead invoke the HC's inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS); and a stay of trial proceedings should be sought when filing the revision to prevent the trial from advancing while the revision is pending. The criminal advocates at the Vadodara panel of Aapka Legal Advice can assess whether the specific order in your case has the kind of legal infirmity that justifies a revision and draft the petition to target that infirmity precisely.


Reply
Share: