Yes, a Delhi civil court can appoint a receiver for disputed property, and this is one of the most effective protective tools available when a property is caught in litigation and neither party can be trusted to manage or preserve it fairly during the dispute. The power comes from Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allows courts to appoint a receiver whenever it appears "just and convenient" to do so — typically to protect rental income, prevent waste or damage, or ensure that the property is not sold or encumbered while ownership is being decided.

Appointment of a receiver is usually sought through an interlocutory application within an ongoing suit, such as a partition suit, a title dispute, or a case involving allegations that one party is misusing or diverting income from the disputed property. The applicant must show that there is a real risk to the property's value or income if it remains under the control of the opposing party, and Delhi courts generally require fairly convincing evidence before making such an appointment, since it does interfere with a party's possessory rights. Once appointed, the receiver — often a court-approved advocate or professional — takes charge of collecting rent, maintaining accounts, and reporting periodically to the court until the dispute is resolved.

A receivership can be a game-changer in disputes involving rented commercial or residential property, where one co-owner or claimant is collecting rent and refusing to share it with the rightful shareholders. It also proves useful where there is a genuine apprehension that a party may attempt to alienate or damage the property before the litigation concludes. Because the threshold for receiver appointment requires a well-drafted application supported by solid evidence, it is advisable to consult Aapka Legal Advice to assess whether your situation meets the "just and convenient" standard the court applies.

Receivership applications are often contested vigorously by the opposing party, since losing control over the property mid-litigation is a significant setback for them, which means your application needs to be airtight from the outset. The Top Property Lawyers in Delhi | Aapka Legal Advice frequently handle such interlocutory applications and understand exactly what evidence Delhi courts expect to see before granting receivership. In high-value or contentious disputes, our panel of retired judges can also offer valuable insight into how such applications are typically evaluated, helping you frame a stronger, more persuasive request.

If you are worried about a disputed property being mismanaged, drained of income, or put at risk while your case is pending, seeking a court-appointed receiver for the disputed property is a proven way to protect its value until the litigation reaches its conclusion.